27.9 C
New York
Monday, June 17, 2024

Robinhood Loses towards Massachusetts Regulator

Must read

Robinhood,
the commission-free brokerage, has suffered a significant defeat in its case towards the
Massachusetts Secretary of State, Invoice Galvin. The Supreme Judicial Court docket of
Massachusetts (SJC) right now (Friday) dominated {that a} state fiduciary obligation rule that’s central to the
case is legitimate, in keeping with Reuters.

In December
2020, Galvin initiated an enforcement motion towards Robinhood, claiming that
the web brokerage failed to guard its clients and their cash. The
Secretary alleged that Robinhood handled buying and selling as a recreation and applied methods
to lure younger and inexperienced merchants. For example, the web dealer allegedly rained down confetti on the cellphone screens of its merchants after the execution of every commerce.

Moreover,
Gavin argued that the alleged failure violated the state’s fiduciary obligation rule
which raised investment-advice requirements for brokers in early 2020. He,
due to this fact, sought to revoke the web buying and selling platform’s broker-dealer license.

See also  How Has Bidenomics Measured Up?

Nonetheless, in March final
12 months, a trial courtroom, the Suffolk County Superior Court docket in Boston, dominated in favour of
Robinhood. The courtroom
argued that federal legal guidelines took priority over the state regulator’s
stipulations. Moreover, Choose Michael Ricciuti, who heard the case, decided that Galvin overstepped his jurisdiction by implementing a regulation that was at odds
with federal laws.

Earlier in
Could, Finance Magnates had reported that Galvin and
Robinhood would argue the validity of the state regulator’s
fiduciary obligation rule on the highest courtroom in Massachusetts. This got here after Gavin appealed towards the ruling on the SJC.

Robinhood,
the commission-free brokerage, has suffered a significant defeat in its case towards the
Massachusetts Secretary of State, Invoice Galvin. The Supreme Judicial Court docket of
Massachusetts (SJC) right now (Friday) dominated {that a} state fiduciary obligation rule that’s central to the
case is legitimate, in keeping with Reuters.

In December
2020, Galvin initiated an enforcement motion towards Robinhood, claiming that
the web brokerage failed to guard its clients and their cash. The
Secretary alleged that Robinhood handled buying and selling as a recreation and applied methods
to lure younger and inexperienced merchants. For example, the web dealer allegedly rained down confetti on the cellphone screens of its merchants after the execution of every commerce.

See also  DCG Earnings Surge with BTC; FMA Alerts on Social Advertisements

Moreover,
Gavin argued that the alleged failure violated the state’s fiduciary obligation rule
which raised investment-advice requirements for brokers in early 2020. He,
due to this fact, sought to revoke the web buying and selling platform’s broker-dealer license.

Nonetheless, in March final
12 months, a trial courtroom, the Suffolk County Superior Court docket in Boston, dominated in favour of
Robinhood. The courtroom
argued that federal legal guidelines took priority over the state regulator’s
stipulations. Moreover, Choose Michael Ricciuti, who heard the case, decided that Galvin overstepped his jurisdiction by implementing a regulation that was at odds
with federal laws.

Earlier in
Could, Finance Magnates had reported that Galvin and
Robinhood would argue the validity of the state regulator’s
fiduciary obligation rule on the highest courtroom in Massachusetts. This got here after Gavin appealed towards the ruling on the SJC.

See also  Binance Stands with Morocco Earthquake Victims

Related News

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest News